This article was written by Marian Wang, an education reporter for ProPublica. It was originally published at ProPublica.org and is reprinted here with permission.
Georgia has been illegally and unnecessarily segregating thousands of students with behavioral issues and disabilities, isolating them in run-down facilities and providing them with subpar education, according to anÂ investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Some of the students in the program were schooled in theÂ same inferior buildings that served black children in the days of Jim Crow. The investigation found that many of the buildings lack gyms, cafeterias, libraries, labs, playgrounds and other amenities.
“It’s a warehouse for kids the school system doesn’t want or know how to deal with,” a parentÂ told the Justice Department of the program. The Justice Department detailed its findings in a letter earlier this month to Georgia’s governor and attorney general.
Federal law mandates that schools educate students with disabilities in the “least restrictive environment” in which they can learn and thrive. More broadly, public entities must serve people with disabilities in the “most integrated setting.”
But what the Justice Department found in Georgia is something that persists across the country: Schools continue toÂ inappropriately segregate students with a range of behavioral needs and disabilities.
Children are often placed in more restrictive settings because traditional public schools show little flexibility in working with students who may need more support.
In Georgia, schools were quick to move children out of mainstream classrooms, the Justice Department noted. In some cases, students were recommended for placement afterÂ a single incident or a string of minor incidents, such as using inappropriate language with a teacher. Parents reported feeling pressured into agreeing to the placements.
In fact, many students who were placed in what’s called the Georgia Network for Educational and Therapeutic Support, or GNETS, didn’t actually need to be there, the Justice Department said. Most could have stayed in their neighborhood schools if they’d been given more behavioral or mental-health support. “Nearly all students in the GNETS Program could receive services in more integrated settings, but do not have the opportunity to do so,” the letter said.
What’s more, because the state has set up a system that tilts toward providing services in segregated settings, the letter said, Georgia “undermines the availability of these services in more integrated settings.”
A spokeswoman for Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal referred questions to the Georgia Department of Education, whose spokesman referred questions to the Attorney General’s Office. Daryl Robinson, counsel to the Georgia Attorney General, told ProPublica, “We don’t have any comment at this time.”
This isn’t the first time that the GNETS has drawn scrutiny. In 2010, aÂ state audit found that the programs “are not held accountable for student performance” and questioned their cost effectiveness. Earlier, in 2004, a 13-year-old boy in the programÂ hanged himself while held for hours isolated in a room.
Advocates haveÂ long been critical of the quality of services offered by the network.
“We have seen many, many clients whose behavior gets significantly worse in GNETS,” said Leslie Lipson, an attorney with the Georgia Advocacy Office. “We’ve seen kids who are significantly behind their peers for no other reason than lack of instruction. We’ve seen students who are great football players or involved in student government or band who are sent to GNETS and have no opportunities to be part of their community.”
The Justice DepartmentÂ threatened the state with a lawsuit if the problems are not corrected. It called on the state to redirect services, training and resources to move students with behavioral challengesÂ back into general-education schools.
In particular, it suggestedÂ increasing access to mental health services by locating mental health clinics “at or near schools” to provide services to students who would otherwise be at risk of being referred to more restrictive, segregated settings.